Το αποτελεσμα θα ειναι οι υπερανθρωποι αυτοι να ξεχωριζουνε απο τους υπολοιπους σε βαθμο που σταδιακα θα επικρατησουνε σε βαρος των ανθρωπων με τα σημερινα χαρακτηριστικα που στο τελος θα χαθουνε ως κατωτερα οντα. Οπως χαθηκε περιπου και ο νεαντερνταλ..
https://www.theguardian.com/science/201 ... ays-reveal
Ως ατομο υπερ της προοδου στηριζω αυτη την προσπαθεια καθως ειναι καλυτερος τροπος για να αντιμετωπιστουνε οι μηχανες και τα ρομποτς..
Ο αλλος ειναι υβριδια ανθρωπων-ρομποτς ανθρωπων δηλαδη που θα κανουνε εγκατασταση τσηπ και μχανκων μερων ωστε να μεγενθυνουνε τις σωματικες τους δυνατοτητες και να αναγωνιστουνε τα ρομποτς..
Τελικα η λυση της παρεμβασης στο δνα σε αντιθεση με αυτο που πιστευε ο Χωκιγκ σως να ειναι σωτηρια..
Οπως και να'χει τα ψωμια του homo sapiens ειναι λιγα. Αν δεν την βρει απο τους υπερανθρωπους του Χωκιγκ θα την βρει απο τις μηχανες..Εκτος κι αν προλαβει και την εξαφανισει η κλιματικη αλλαγη,,,ενα αλλο σεναριο του Χωκιγκ και αλλων.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/201 ... ays-reveal
Essays reveal Stephen Hawking predicted race of 'superhumans'
Physicist said genetic editing may create species that could destroy rest of humanity
Sun 14 Oct 2018 13.28 BST Last modified on Sun 14 Oct 2018 19.55 BST
Stephen Hawking: ‘Some people won’t be able to resist the temptation to improve human characteristics.’ Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA
The late physicist and author Prof Stephen Hawking has caused controversy by suggesting a new race of superhumans could develop from wealthy people choosing to edit their and their children’s DNA.
Hawking, the author of A Brief History of Time, who died in March, made the predictions in a collection of articles and essays.
The scientist presented the possibility that genetic engineering could create a new species of superhuman that could destroy the rest of humanity. The essays, published in the Sunday Times, were written in preparation for a book that will be published on Tuesday.
“I am sure that during this century, people will discover how to modify both intelligence and instincts such as aggression,” he wrote.
“Laws will probably be passed against genetic engineering with humans. But some people won’t be able to resist the temptation to improve human characteristics, such as memory, resistance to disease and length of life.”
A brief history of A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking
Read more
In Brief Answers to the Big Questions, Hawking’s final thoughts on the universe, the physicist suggested wealthy people would soon be able to choose to edit genetic makeup to create superhumans with enhanced memory, disease resistance, intelligence and longevity.
Hawking raised the prospect that breakthroughs in genetics will make it attractive for people to try to improve themselves, with implications for “unimproved humans”.
“Once such superhumans appear, there will be significant political problems with unimproved humans, who won’t be able to compete,” he wrote. “Presumably, they will die out, or become unimportant. Instead, there will be a race of self-designing beings who are improving at an ever-increasing rate.”
The comments refer to techniques such as Crispr-Cas9, a DNA-editing system that was invented six years ago, allowing scientists to modify harmful genes or add new ones. Great Ormond Street hospital for children in London has used gene editing to treat children with an otherwise incurable form of leukaemia.
What is Crispr?
Crispr, or to give it its full name, Crispr-Cas9, allows scientists to precisely target and edit pieces of the genome. Crispr is a guide molecule made of RNA, that allows a specific site of interest on the DNA double helix to be targeted. The RNA molecule is attached to Cas9, a bacterial enzyme that works as a pair of "molecular scissors" to cut the DNA at the exact point required. This allows scientists to cut, paste and delete single letters of genetic code.
Advertisement
However, questions have been raised about whether parents would risk using such techniques for fear that the enhancements would have side-effects.
The astronomer Lord Rees, who was a friend of Hawking at Cambridge University but often disagreed with his peer, noted a sperm bank in California offering only “elite” sperm, including from Nobel prize winners, had closed due to lack of demand.