Phorum.com.gr

ΑΛΟΓΟΜΟΥΡΗΣ έγραψε: 19 Νοέμ 2021, 23:47
και concered τι ακριβώς εννοεί; ειδικά με το concenred

Orion22 έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:09 Libtards κρατήστε δακρυα, είναι ακόμα στην αρχή:
τώρα αρχίζουν τα ωραία λαιμαι

Spoiler

"In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life," specifically calling out President Biden, LeBron James and Rep. Ayana Pressley, D-Mass., in addition to countless liberal pundits.

A guest on MSNBC compared him to a "school shooter," while another said he is "arguably a domestic terrorist." MSNBC’s Joy Reid referred to him as a "vigilante," and Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Wis., used the "White supremacist" term when talking about Rittenhouse during an appearance on CNN in March.

"With Kyle's name dragged through the mud, and the clear effect it is having on him, many have started to ask the question whether Kyle should sue for defamation. While I am by no means an attorney, I have gained some experience on the ins and outs of defamation and can offer an educated guess on what the outcome would be if Kyle were to sue," Sandmann wrote, explaining how difficult defamation cases are to win.
Kyle Rittenhouse pulls numbers of jurors out of a tumbler during his trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse. (Photo by Sean Krajacic-Pool/Getty Images)

Kyle Rittenhouse pulls numbers of jurors out of a tumbler during his trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse. (Photo by Sean Krajacic-Pool/Getty Images)

"Should Kyle sue? It first depends on what happens in the trial, as those elements would come into play were he found guilty. However, if Kyle is innocent it would create an easier road to winning," Sandmann wrote. "If Kyle is prepared to take on another burden in his early life, with the acceptance that it might result in nothing, I answer, give it a shot and hold the media accountable."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Sandmann believes that "one of the saddening parts of this media onslaught is that it has taken young people like Kyle and myself to expose how corrupt the media really is," and, as a result, he couldn’t wait for a verdict before weighing in.

"I cannot hold back on the media's public execution of him before the trial has concluded," Sandmann wrote. "At this time I would like to use my platform to let Kyle know that I am here for you and if you ever would like to reach out to me, I am about the only person our age to have an idea of how the media is treating you. The way the media has treated you is terrible, and you don't have to face it alone."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/nick-sand ... defamation

Scouser έγραψε: 19 Νοέμ 2021, 23:50
Μαλάκα μου, γελάω σαν χαζός εδώ και 5 λεπτά. Ψυχολογική υποστήριξη για όσους θα γίνουν triggered από το αποτέλεσμα της δίκης λέει. Και αυτά τα τυπάκια προορίζονται τώρα να βγουν αύριο μεθαύριο στην αγορά εργασίας και να ζήσουν σαν ενήλικες, ε;

BigChiefWahoo έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:11

ΑΛΟΓΟΜΟΥΡΗΣ έγραψε: 19 Νοέμ 2021, 23:47
και concered τι ακριβώς εννοεί; ειδικά με το concenred

2 στα 2 τύπε,έλεος.

ΑΛΟΓΟΜΟΥΡΗΣ έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:19
Ναι το πρόσεξα εκ των υστέρων
εντάξει, σταυρώστε με

talaipwros έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:12

Orion22 έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:09 Libtards κρατήστε δακρυα, είναι ακόμα στην αρχή:
τώρα αρχίζουν τα ωραία λαιμαι

Spoiler

"In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life," specifically calling out President Biden, LeBron James and Rep. Ayana Pressley, D-Mass., in addition to countless liberal pundits.

A guest on MSNBC compared him to a "school shooter," while another said he is "arguably a domestic terrorist." MSNBC’s Joy Reid referred to him as a "vigilante," and Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Wis., used the "White supremacist" term when talking about Rittenhouse during an appearance on CNN in March.

"With Kyle's name dragged through the mud, and the clear effect it is having on him, many have started to ask the question whether Kyle should sue for defamation. While I am by no means an attorney, I have gained some experience on the ins and outs of defamation and can offer an educated guess on what the outcome would be if Kyle were to sue," Sandmann wrote, explaining how difficult defamation cases are to win.
Kyle Rittenhouse pulls numbers of jurors out of a tumbler during his trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse. (Photo by Sean Krajacic-Pool/Getty Images)

Kyle Rittenhouse pulls numbers of jurors out of a tumbler during his trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse. (Photo by Sean Krajacic-Pool/Getty Images)

"Should Kyle sue? It first depends on what happens in the trial, as those elements would come into play were he found guilty. However, if Kyle is innocent it would create an easier road to winning," Sandmann wrote. "If Kyle is prepared to take on another burden in his early life, with the acceptance that it might result in nothing, I answer, give it a shot and hold the media accountable."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Sandmann believes that "one of the saddening parts of this media onslaught is that it has taken young people like Kyle and myself to expose how corrupt the media really is," and, as a result, he couldn’t wait for a verdict before weighing in.

"I cannot hold back on the media's public execution of him before the trial has concluded," Sandmann wrote. "At this time I would like to use my platform to let Kyle know that I am here for you and if you ever would like to reach out to me, I am about the only person our age to have an idea of how the media is treating you. The way the media has treated you is terrible, and you don't have to face it alone."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/nick-sand ... defamation

σε αυτο οι αγγλοι εχουν ενα καλο στα πολλα στραβα τους, το οτι απαγορευεται οποιοσδηποτε σχολιασμος/χαρακτηρισμος μιας υποθεσης οταν ειναι στην δικαιοσυνη, επι ποινης φυλακισης

ΑΛΟΓΟΜΟΥΡΗΣ έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:20

talaipwros έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:12

Orion22 έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:09 Libtards κρατήστε δακρυα, είναι ακόμα στην αρχή:
τώρα αρχίζουν τα ωραία λαιμαι

Spoiler

https://www.foxnews.com/media/nick-sand ... defamation

σε αυτο οι αγγλοι εχουν ενα καλο στα πολλα στραβα τους, το οτι απαγορευεται οποιοσδηποτε σχολιασμος/χαρακτηρισμος μιας υποθεσης οταν ειναι στην δικαιοσυνη, επι ποινης φυλακισης

και αυτό είναι το σωστό

nostromos έγραψε: 20 Νοέμ 2021, 00:25 και τι γινεται στις περιπτωσεις παραπληροφορησης ...?

https://twitter.com/willcain/status/1461806470081695752