Phorum.com.gr

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 15:30

Nandros έγραψε: 28 Ιούλ 2018, 16:16

skartados έγραψε: 28 Ιούλ 2018, 02:22Εγώ μμίλησα για επίβόλη_κατάκτηση.
Ήδη έχω πει στο νημΑ,ότι ούτε οι Ρωμαίοιι δεν κατάφεραν μα επίβαλλουν τη γλώσσα τους σε όλη την αυτοκρατορία,που ήταν και πολιτισμενοι

Ψεύδεσαι χοντρά για να στηρίξεις τις παπαρολογίες σου!

Romanization or Latinization (or Romanisation or Latinisation), in the historical and cultural meanings of both terms, indicate different historical processes, such as acculturation, integration and assimilation of newly incorporated and peripheral populations by the Roman Republic and the later Roman Empire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanization_(cultural)

Μιλάνε στην Ασία λατινική διάλεκτο?ΟΧΙ
Μιλάνε στη βορεια Αφρική λατινική διάλεκτο?ΟΧΙ
Ξέρεις μεχρι που εκτεινόταν η Ρωμαϊκή αυτοκρατορία?

Αν πραγματικά γνωρίζεις,Γιατί γράφεις ότι ψευδομαι?

Ηράκλειτος έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 15:37

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 15:30Μιλάνε στην Ασία λατινική διάλεκτο?ΟΧΙ
Μιλάνε στη βορεια Αφρική λατινική διάλεκτο?ΟΧΙ
Ξέρεις μεχρι που εκτεινόταν η Ρωμαϊκή αυτοκρατορία?

Αν πραγματικά γνωρίζεις,Γιατί γράφεις ότι ψευδομαι?

Οι περιοχές αυτές κατακτήθηκαν αργότερα από τους Άραβες, γι' αυτό και μιλούν αραβικές διαλέκτους.

Yochanan έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 16:33 Oχι, οχι μονο οι ΙΕ. Και οι Τουρκοι πχ και οι Αραβες επεβαλαν τις γλωσσες τους εκει που κατεκτησαν. Σορρυ δεν εχω παρακολουθησει ολη την κουβεντα απο την αρχη - ισως το εχετε καλυψει αυτο.

Nandros έγραψε: 21 Ιουν 2018, 17:29 https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank
crackpot is a pejorative term applied to someone who holds extremely unorthodox views on a subject and is often very vocal about these opinions.
A crackpot will usually maintain his viewpoint despite — or perhaps because of — evidence to the contrary.
The typical crank is an amateur in the field he is arguing against, but occasionally, individuals with genuine expertise in the field in question will turn into cranks (which generally leads to pathological science).

If you value your time and/or sanity, then under no circumstances should you willingly enter into debate with a crank. A crank's cognitive processes are impregnable to all forms of logic, reason, evidence, and in extreme cases, basic facts.

Crank debaters tend to be much, much more motivated than you are. This enthusiasm is a big part of what makes them cranks. This means that the crank will have heard all of the common objections to their crankiness. The crank has memorized canned responses to each of them.

A common tactic of cranks is to hide behind elaborate rhetoric; if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. An extravagantly ornate lexicon filled with polysyllabic verbiage will be utilized unnecessarily, inappropriately, and often erroneously with a greater frequency of occurrence than Greenpeace produces outright falsehoods, because if their opposition's comprehension is obfuscated, it's because their opponent is cogitatively inadequate and not because the crank malcommunicates. Never expect a fancy word such as "terse" to grace their tongues. Superfluous rhetoric itself is not proof of crankery, but is a good warning sign.

All of this has the practical upshot of rendering the debate a fantastic waste of calories.

Nandros έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 17:37

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 14:54

Nandros έγραψε: 28 Ιούλ 2018, 15:56
Όχι, στα Ελληνικά σημαίνει μέλος της φατρίας.

Στα Αγγλικά υπάρχει το brotherhood (με διάφορες ερμηνείες):
The state of being brothers or a brother.
An association for any purpose, such as a society of monks; a fraternity.
The whole body of persons engaged in the same business, especially those of the same profession.
Persons, and, poetically, things, of a like kind.

The Greek word φρατήρ
Word φρατήρ
pʰ r a t ɛː. r
IPA pʰratɛː.r
Meaning brother, phratry member
See also Phrygian: ΒΡΑΤΕΡΕ ‘brother’
Old Norse: bryþr ‘brother’
Tocharian B: procer ‘brother’
http://www.palaeolexicon.com/Word/Show/19333

+

τεστ2.jpg

Από την σελ 1626 του Λεξικού Liddell & Scott με πολλές αναφορές της λέξης στην Ελληνική Γραμματεία.
.

Ρε συ,τυφλός έισαι,δεν βλέπεις την πηγή που έφερες εσύ ο ίδιος που γράφει meaning brother?
Ε
Λ
Ε
Ό
Σ

Άρα μου χρωστάς 1000 ευρώ! Πώς θα με πληρώσεις;
.

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 19:20

Nandros έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 17:37

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 14:54 Ρε συ,τυφλός έισαι,δεν βλέπεις την πηγή που έφερες εσύ ο ίδιος που γράφει meaning brother?
Ε
Λ
Ε
Ό
Σ

Άρα μου χρωστάς 1000 ευρώ! Πώς θα με πληρώσεις;
.

Γιατί στα χρωστάω;Έφερες σε αρχαίο κειμνέο το φρατηρ και να σημαινει αδελφός;Ένα λεξικό έφερες που άλλα γράφει και άλλα νομιζεις

Nandros έγραψε: 21 Ιουν 2018, 17:29 https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank
crackpot is a pejorative term applied to someone who holds extremely unorthodox views on a subject and is often very vocal about these opinions.
A crackpot will usually maintain his viewpoint despite — or perhaps because of — evidence to the contrary.
The typical crank is an amateur in the field he is arguing against, but occasionally, individuals with genuine expertise in the field in question will turn into cranks (which generally leads to pathological science).

If you value your time and/or sanity, then under no circumstances should you willingly enter into debate with a crank. A crank's cognitive processes are impregnable to all forms of logic, reason, evidence, and in extreme cases, basic facts.

Crank debaters tend to be much, much more motivated than you are. This enthusiasm is a big part of what makes them cranks. This means that the crank will have heard all of the common objections to their crankiness. The crank has memorized canned responses to each of them.

A common tactic of cranks is to hide behind elaborate rhetoric; if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. An extravagantly ornate lexicon filled with polysyllabic verbiage will be utilized unnecessarily, inappropriately, and often erroneously with a greater frequency of occurrence than Greenpeace produces outright falsehoods, because if their opposition's comprehension is obfuscated, it's because their opponent is cogitatively inadequate and not because the crank malcommunicates. Never expect a fancy word such as "terse" to grace their tongues. Superfluous rhetoric itself is not proof of crankery, but is a good warning sign.

All of this has the practical upshot of rendering the debate a fantastic waste of calories.

Δεν παραδέχεται την ΙΕ θεωρία και έχει έναν σορό επιχειρήματα. Εναλλακτική θεωρία δεν μας φέρνει

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 21:49 Μας λένε ότι το λατινικό charta είναι ελληνικό δάνειο από το Χάρτης,αλλά το magna δεν είναιΐ δάνειο από το μαγνης ,είναι ομμοριζα.
Βρε δεν γαμιουνται

Beria έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 22:00

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 21:49 Μας λένε ότι το λατινικό charta είναι ελληνικό δάνειο από το Χάρτης,αλλά το magna δεν είναιΐ δάνειο από το μαγνης ,είναι ομμοριζα.
Βρε δεν γαμιουνται

Ο Σκαρτάδος μόλις κατέρριψε -δια παντός- την ψευδώνυμη ΙΕ Θεωρία
Με δυο λέξεις

Τα Τμήματα Γλωσσολογίας σε όλα τα ευρωπαϊκά Πανεπιστήμια δεν θα ανοίξουν ξανά
Μόλις έστειλε στην ανεργία κάτι εκατοντάδες καθηγητές

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 21:30Εναλλακτική θεωρία σε τι;
Σε κάτι που μας λέει ότι το σιστερ είναι ομμοριζο με το εορ ,αλλά το εορ είναι αυπαρκτο;

Σε κάτι που μας λέει ότι τα πατηρ-μήτηρ-αστήρ Είναι πιε ριζες χωρίς κατάληξη;Όταν μάλιστα το επίθημα τηρ είναι απο τα πιο συχνά Στην Ελληνική Γλώσσα;Τι να κα νουμΕ τώρα,στην ελληνική γλώσσα,τα ουσιαστικά δημιουργουνται με ρίζα + επίθημα

Σε κάτι που μας λέει ότι το φρατηρ σημαινει αδελφός,επειδή αυτό σημαινει το μπραδερ;

Αλλά 100 τέτοια μπορω να σε πω

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 21:35Με ανύπαρκτες λέξεις,έννοιες,γραμματικες,εγώ φτιάχνω 50 άλλες τέτοιες θεωρίες

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 21:49Μας λένε ότι το λατινικό charta είναι ελληνικό δάνειο από το Χάρτης,αλλά το magna δεν είναιΐ δάνειο από το μαγνης ,είναι ομμοριζα.
Βρε δεν γαμιουνται

Nandros έγραψε: 21 Ιουν 2018, 17:29 https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank
crackpot is a pejorative term applied to someone who holds extremely unorthodox views on a subject and is often very vocal about these opinions.
A crackpot will usually maintain his viewpoint despite — or perhaps because of — evidence to the contrary.
The typical crank is an amateur in the field he is arguing against, but occasionally, individuals with genuine expertise in the field in question will turn into cranks (which generally leads to pathological science).

If you value your time and/or sanity, then under no circumstances should you willingly enter into debate with a crank. A crank's cognitive processes are impregnable to all forms of logic, reason, evidence, and in extreme cases, basic facts.

Crank debaters tend to be much, much more motivated than you are. This enthusiasm is a big part of what makes them cranks. This means that the crank will have heard all of the common objections to their crankiness. The crank has memorized canned responses to each of them.

A common tactic of cranks is to hide behind elaborate rhetoric; if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. An extravagantly ornate lexicon filled with polysyllabic verbiage will be utilized unnecessarily, inappropriately, and often erroneously with a greater frequency of occurrence than Greenpeace produces outright falsehoods, because if their opposition's comprehension is obfuscated, it's because their opponent is cogitatively inadequate and not because the crank malcommunicates. Never expect a fancy word such as "terse" to grace their tongues. Superfluous rhetoric itself is not proof of crankery, but is a good warning sign.

All of this has the practical upshot of rendering the debate a fantastic waste of calories.

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 22:58 Εύκολη νίκη

Nandros έγραψε: 21 Ιουν 2018, 17:29 https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank
crackpot is a pejorative term applied to someone who holds extremely unorthodox views on a subject and is often very vocal about these opinions.
A crackpot will usually maintain his viewpoint despite — or perhaps because of — evidence to the contrary.
The typical crank is an amateur in the field he is arguing against, but occasionally, individuals with genuine expertise in the field in question will turn into cranks (which generally leads to pathological science).

If you value your time and/or sanity, then under no circumstances should you willingly enter into debate with a crank. A crank's cognitive processes are impregnable to all forms of logic, reason, evidence, and in extreme cases, basic facts.

Crank debaters tend to be much, much more motivated than you are. This enthusiasm is a big part of what makes them cranks. This means that the crank will have heard all of the common objections to their crankiness. The crank has memorized canned responses to each of them.

A common tactic of cranks is to hide behind elaborate rhetoric; if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. An extravagantly ornate lexicon filled with polysyllabic verbiage will be utilized unnecessarily, inappropriately, and often erroneously with a greater frequency of occurrence than Greenpeace produces outright falsehoods, because if their opposition's comprehension is obfuscated, it's because their opponent is cogitatively inadequate and not because the crank malcommunicates. Never expect a fancy word such as "terse" to grace their tongues. Superfluous rhetoric itself is not proof of crankery, but is a good warning sign.

All of this has the practical upshot of rendering the debate a fantastic waste of calories.

skartados έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 16:45

Yochanan έγραψε: 29 Ιούλ 2018, 16:33 Oχι, οχι μονο οι ΙΕ. Και οι Τουρκοι πχ και οι Αραβες επεβαλαν τις γλωσσες τους εκει που κατεκτησαν. Σορρυ δεν εχω παρακολουθησει ολη την κουβεντα απο την αρχη - ισως το εχετε καλυψει αυτο.

Οι Τούρκοι δεν το έκαναν,βλεπε βαλκανια. Μικρά Ασία ,πόντο ως το 22
Με τους άραβες δεν ξέρω,δεν βγαινει άκρη.Κατεκτησαν την Κρήτη για αιώνες,την Ισπανία επίσης ,αλλά τη γλώσσα τους εκεί δεν την επεβαλλαν.Μόνο οι ιε ήταν γλωσσοκαυλιαρηδες