!!! DEVELOPMENT MODE !!!

Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Ιστορικά γεγονότα, καταστάσεις, αναδρομές
Nero

Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

Ο οίκος της βριέννης γύρω στο στο 1311 έχασε τις περισσότερες κτήσεις του στην Ελλάδα απο τους Καταλανούς αλλά αυτό δε σταμάτησε τους επιγόνους τους να περιτριγυρίζουν την Ευρώπη με τον τίτλο του "Δούκα των Αθηνών" ελπίζοντας είτε να ψαρώσει κανείς και να τους δώσει γη είτε να μαζέψουν 5 κορόιδα ως μισθοφορικό στρατό και να επιστρέψουν στην Ελλάδα να πάρουν τις παλιές κτήσεις τους πίσω. Ένας Απ'αυτούς ήταν και ο Βάλτερ ο ΣΤ', ο γιος του τύπου έχασε την Αθήνα στη μάχη του Αλμυρού. Μετά από αρκετές περιπλανήσεις, κάποιοι για κάποιο λόγο στη Φλωρεντία που εκείνο τον καιρό ήταν σε βαθιά οικονομική κρίση και είχε εξωτερικές απειλές θεώρησαν ότι ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών" ακούγεται σημαντικός τίτλος, άρα σκέφτηκαν ότι ως άνθρωπος με credentials, είναι ο κατάληλλος άνθρωπος για να τους ξεχρεώσει και τον κάλεσαν να αναλάβει για ένα διάστημα τη διακυβέρνηση της πόλης.

Παρακάτω είναι η σούμα, μετά θα παραθέσω μερικά κομμάτια απο το βαρουφάκειο οικονομικό του πρόγραμμα με το οποίο αντιμετώπισε την κρίση χρέους λόγω μεγάλου κρατικού δανεισμού:

In a time of crisis the Republic of Florence turned to a brash noble to lead their city. He soon turned into a disgraceful tyrant. Could the Florentine citizens overthrow him before a plot to murder hundreds of people could be carried out?

The story of the events of 1342 and 1343 are told by Giovanni Villani, a Florentine chronicler who had a keen eye for detailing the story of his city as well as what was happening in other parts of Europe. His New Chronicle highlighted the many successes Florence had in building their Republic, but also noted the difficult times they were facing in the 1340s. He lists a number of troubles that they were enduring: “flood, crop failures, famine and sickness, defeats, failed ventures, loss of capital, failure of merchants, unpaid debts” and blamed those who were in government – “these lesser artisans, ignorant idiots, willful men without discretion” – for this decline.

The spring of 1342 saw another humiliation for Florence – their military forces were defeated by their archrivals from Pisa, and had lost to them the city of Lucca. Some of the leading men of the city used the defeat to elect a foreigner to be the new captain general – Walter, Count of Brienne, a French noble who also held lordships in parts of Italy. He was better known to the chronicler as the Duke of Athens, although he never actually ruled that city, but it was his most grandiose title.

As someone with experience in warfare and with noble connections, the Florentines thought he was a perfect choice to lead the city, albeit for a limited term. The Duke also gained support from key families by making sure their faltering businesses would not go bankrupt or have to pay their debts. The lower classes backed him as well, as they had become discontent with their own government and looked to him bring greatness back the Republic. Villani writes that “the citizens had his coat of arms painted on nearly every corner and every house in Florence, some to curry favour and some out of fear.”

Although a deal was made for him to rule the city for a year, the Duke of Athens had other plans. On September 8, 1342, Walter was accompanied by 420 soldiers as he marched through the city to Piazza of the Priors where he would be confirmed into office. Villani writes:

Incited by certain wool carders and people of the lowest class, and by the followers of certain grandi, the crowd began to cry out, “may the duke’s lordship be for life, for life!” and “long live the duke our lord!” He was lifted up bodily by the grandi, who wished to place him in the palace. On finding it locked they began to cry, “get the axes!” and so the door had to be opened. And so by force and trickery they placed him in lordship in the palace while shamefully moving the priors to the chamber of arms in the lowest part of the building. Some of the grandi tore up the book containing the Ordinances of Justice and also the banner of justice; they raised the duke’s banners on the tower while the bells rang te deum laudamus.

The duke used these actions to force the Florentine government to make him the ruler of the city for life, and afterwards removed these officials from their posts. His relatives and supporters soon came to Florence, along with hundreds of mercenaries from Burgundy, to take control of their city. The money brought by taxes and forced loans went to rebuilding the Duke’s palace, while those homes around it were seized and given to his supporters. Moreover, he was using his power to embezzle funds and send it out of Florence to his other estates in Italy and France. Meanwhile, the key reason he was brought to rule Florence – to lead the city’s armies against Pisa – was settled when he made peace with the rival state. This included agreeing to allow the Pisans to keep Lucca, a clause that enraged many Florentines.

The Duke was astute enough to spend money on feasts and jousts within the city, giving the masses a distraction. However, Villani clearly hated him. He described Walter as “a lord of little constancy and did not keep his promises. He was greedy, avaricious and lacking in grace. He was small in statute, ugly, with a little beard.” He also accused him and his supporters of various crimes and scandals:

He and his men began to use force and do villainous and obscene thing to the wives and daughters of citizens…for the love of women he gave ornaments to the women of Florence and created a place for women of easy virtue from which his marshal drew much profit.

He was also at work crushing dissent. Villani reports what happened when one official complained about the high taxes he issued:

The duke had his tongue torn out all the way to the roots, and had it carried around the city on a lance for laughs; he then exiled Bettone to Pesaro, where he died shortly thereafter from the cutting of his tongue. The citizens were greatly upset by this punishment, and everyone realized that they could neither speak nor complain about wrongs and outrages.

By the early months of 1343 the situation in Republic had become unbearable and that the Duke was no longer the city’s saviour but its tyrant. Villani explained that those:

who had expected him to give them great power and grandeur as he had promised, found themselves fooled and betrayed…no one was making money, because of the poor state of the city, because of the unbearable burden of taxes, forced loans, and intolerable gabelles… And whereas the citizens had hoped that expenses would decrease owing to his rule and that he would give them a prosperous state, he did the opposite; and because of bad harvests, grain prices rose to more than twenty soldi per staio, whence the popolo minuto was discontent. And the offenses against women by himself and by his people, as well as other acts of force and crude justice, moved almost the majority of the citizens to ill will against him. Hence a number of conspiracies were planned to take his rule and his life.

One of these plots was led by a group of men who had learned that Duke would go to a certain house “for amorous meetings with a woman.” They rented two other houses on that same street and stocked it with arms and crossbows. Over fifty young men were recruited to attack the Duke the next time he went there, but one of the conspirators told the wrong man, who then informed Walter about the plan. Some of the plotters were arrested, but as the Duke learned of how large the conspiracy was against him, he came up with a more drastic plan. He was going to request for more than 300 of the most important citizens of Florence to come to his palace on Saturday, July 26th. Villani reports that “when these men gathered in the hall of the palace – the hall with the barred windows we described earlier – he would have it closed off and would have had all those inside killed and cut to pieces.”


The invitations went out. Villani writes that “the city of Florence was at a boiling point, full of suspicion and fear.” As many of the people wondered if they should go to the palace or go into hiding, others decided that they had to act now to overthrow the tyrant.

The Adimari, the Medici, and the Donati – who were the leaders – planned that at nones on Saturday the 26th of July, the Feast of St. Anne, in the year of our Lord 1343, when the workers left their shops, certain rascals should feign a scuffle in the Mercato Vecchio and in Porta San Piero and cry out “to arms, to arms!” And so they did. The city was cowed and fearful, and all immediately ran pell-mell to clear out the places dear to them. And right away, as planned, all the citizens were armed – on horse and on foot – each in his own district and neighbourhood, pulling out banners with the arms of the popolo and the commune, as planned, and crying out, “death to the duke and to his followers, and long live the popolo and the Florentine commune and liberty!” And immediately the entrances to all streets and all districts throughout the city were barred and blocked.

As the Duke’s supporters rushed to the palace, the people of Florence took control of the city and broke into the prisons, freeing the captives. While the Duke had several hundred armed men, including his Burgundian troops, to defend him, there were thousands of Florentines who rose up against him. Villani describes the scene:

By day and by night they fought with the duke’s men in the palace and on the piazza. There were quite a few killed but many more wounded by the thick hail of arrows and stones that came from the duke’s men in the palace. But in the end, by that same evening, the duke’s men on the piazza could hold out no longer and lacked provisions; they left their horses and most fled within the walls of the palace to join the duke and his barons, while some found protection among our people by leaving their weapons and horses – some were captured and some were wounded.

The citizens soon established a provisional government and surrounded the Duke’s palace. They offered Walter a deal that if he renounced his lifetime rulership, they would let him leave Florence unharmed. The Duke rejected the deal, but then his Burgundian soldiers told him that they would not “die of hunger and of torture” and that they would hand him over to the people of Florence unless he agreed. With no options left, the Duke accepted the terms.

Vengeance would be handed out to Guglielmo d’Assisi, who was the Duke’s conservator and the man who carried out many of the crimes against the people. The Burgundians first took his 18-year old son and pushed him through the gate of the palace into the hands of the angry popolo, into the hands of the relatives and friends of men his father had punished – mainly these were the Altoviti, Medici, Ruccellai, and Bettone, but also others. In the presence of the father, to cause him more pain, these men took the son and cut him limb from limb into tiny pieces right before his father’s eyes. This done, the conservator was pushed out and they did the same to him. People carried pieces of their flesh through the city on lances or swords, and some were so cruel – filled with bestial fury and hatred – that they ate their flesh raw and cooked. Such was the end of the traitor and persecutor of the popolo of Florence. And note that whoever is cruel, cruelly must die, dixit Domino.

On August 3rd the Duke of Athens formally surrendered the palace and left the city. Although he and his remaining supporters feared that they would be attacked, they were allowed to leave peacefully. Villani concludes the tyrant’s downfall this way:

Such was the end of the lordship of the Duke of Athens, usurped through trickery and treachery from the commune and the popolo of Florence, and such was the end of his tyrannical rule – just as he betrayed the commune, so he was betrayed by the citizens. He left with much shame and dishonor, but also much money he took from us – we whom an ancient vernacular proverb calls blind, because of our faults and discords. He left us in a bad way.

giovanni-villani-new-chronicleWhile Florence would endure more troubles – including the devastation of the Black Death a few years later – the Duke of Athens would have a less happy ending. On September 19th, 1356, Walter was one of the leaders on the French side at the Battle of Poitiers, where he would be killed on the battlefield.

...

http://www.medievalists.net/2016/10/how ... -the-duke/
Τελευταία επεξεργασία από το μέλος Nero την 29 Ιουν 2019, 23:13, έχει επεξεργασθεί 1 φορά συνολικά.
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

....

Once again they opted for extensive powers in the hands of a prestigious
foreigner and chose Walter of Brienne, Charles of Calabria’s former vicar in
1326–8. Brienne was a known quantity and was well connected in both Naples
and Avignon, where the threatened companies faced many angry creditors.
:smt047
The bankers who invited him to assume military and political leadership hoped
he would enact the inevitably unpopular policies needed to save their companies.
In early 1342 they also gave him command of the communal armies fighting
Pisa. But Brienne had ambitions of his own and in September had himself
declared signore of Florence for life.

As it happened, he remained in office for
a mere ten months before being driven out by the same elite families that
had brought him in. After his expulsion on July 26, 1343 (which also became
a civic holiday), and the gruesome murder of his most hated officials, the
Florentines created the legend of the brutal and corrupt despot who tried to
deprive them of their liberty. Brienne did enforce communal laws with particular
severity, inflicted huge fines and capital punishment on transgressors,
and contemptuously disregarded the republic’s officials and councils. But the
other side of the story is his serious and substantially successful effort to
put the commune’s fiscal affairs in order with reforms that threatened elite
interests.


Having alienated the elite, he sought to broaden his political support
among both minor guildsmen and the textile artisans with measures that
further enraged the elite. His brief signoria reawakened latent social tensions
that led, after his ouster, to the formation of a new popular government.15
Brienne tried to stop the growing debt from consuming the city’s wealth
through indirect taxes.

To reduce government spending, he ended the war
against Pisa and suspended the assignment of gabelle revenues to debt repayment
and interest. He instituted a stricter system for assessing wealth and
collecting taxes in the contado and, most important of all, reinstituted the
estimo and direct taxation in the city: the same policy attempted by Charles
of Calabria and quickly annulled by the elite-dominated government that
succeeded him. Both aspects of this new fiscal regime damaged elite interests.
Whereas the companies, needing cash to pay worried creditors, expected regular interest payments on their large investment in the debt, they faced instead a suspension of payments and the simultaneous imposition of direct taxes. Brienne
was not trying to ruin the companies. In fact, he approved a three-year immunity
for the Dell’Antella company against civil actions by creditors, which,
subsequently extended to other firms, gave the companies time to build their
cash holdings, pressure their debtors, and protect landed property from the
bankruptcy commissions through fictitious sales or alienations.16 But, while
willing to help them in this way, Brienne’s fiscal reforms could not have come
at a worse time for the companies.

So Brienne turned elsewhere to build a political constituency. He released
the guild of the Vinattieri from its debts to the commune for the suddenly
declining gabelle on the retail sale of wine and reduced the similar obligations
of the provisioning guilds.

....

Brienne went further. He protected and raised the status of salaried workers
in the woolen cloth industry by appointing officials to oversee the various
categories of workers and to monitor the jurisdiction and regulatory power
traditionally exercised by the Lana.

...

Brienne may have been a hero to workers, but he had become a lethal
danger to the elite and to the Wool guild. Elite families, including magnates,
led the conspiracies against him and tried to take political control after his
departure.

https://books.google.gr/books/about/A_H ... edir_esc=y
ψάχνανε Σόιμπλε αλλά τους βγήκε Βαρουφάκης :a040:
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

Μπορεί ο ατυχής αυτός Έλλην να ήταν μια περιπλανώμενη απάτη αλλά φαίνεται ότι τα φιλολαϊκά του μέτρα άνοιξαν την όρεξη στο προλεταριάτο. Φορολογία της μεγάλης περιουσίας, επέκταση των συνδικάτων και προστασία ανειδίκευτων εργατών ήταν επίσης στη ατζέντα των Τσιόμπι μερικές δεκαετίες αργότερα
Άβαταρ μέλους
Ζενίθεδρος
Δημοσιεύσεις: 15492
Εγγραφή: 27 Ιούλ 2018, 18:56
Phorum.gr user: Ζενίθεδρος
Επικοινωνία:

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Ζενίθεδρος »

ΤΩΝ

Ποιό αρσενικοθηλυκο είναι αυτό που χεις στο αβατάρι ρε συ;
Ακόμα τούτη ή άνοιξη ραγιάδες, ραγιάδες, τούτο το καλοκαίρι, μέχρι να ρθεί ο Μόσκοβος να φέρει το σεφέρι.
☦𓀢
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

Ζενίθεδρος έγραψε: 29 Ιουν 2019, 23:11 ΤΩΝ

Ποιό αρσενικοθηλυκο είναι αυτό που χεις στο αβατάρι ρε συ;
ευχαριστώ για την παρατήρηση. Παρακαλώ να είστε πιο ευγενικός προς τη Βιβιάνα
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

λίγα γενικά για το πως λειτουργούσε η οικονομία απο τον έγκυρο economist

https://www.economist.com/books-and-art ... capitalism

όταν εμείς είχαμε ακόμα ευνούχους παρακοιμώμενους, αυτοί είχανε perpetual bonds, εμφια, υπέρογκο κρατικό χρέος και υπερχρεωμένες τράπεζες που ξελάσπωνε το κράτος
Άβαταρ μέλους
NewModelArmy
Δημοσιεύσεις: 6236
Εγγραφή: 08 Φεβ 2019, 21:39

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από NewModelArmy »

Ωραιες ιστοριες αυτες με τα απειρα δουκατα,βασιλεια,λοιπα κρατη στη μεσαιωνικη ευρωπη.Αναβιωσαν τις πολεις κρατη της αρχαιας Ελλαδας και για αυτο προοδευσαν ενω στο Βυζαντιο ειχαμε τον καθε βλαχοστρατηγο να κανει μια εξεγερση και να το παιζει εκλεκτος του Θεου
Άβαταρ μέλους
Yochanan
Δημοσιεύσεις: 16962
Εγγραφή: 31 Μαρ 2018, 13:44
Phorum.gr user: Yochanan

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Yochanan »

πολυ ωραίο ιστορικο νημα οπως παντα Νερωνα. Για το τελετυαιο ποστ να πω οτι η λεξη bankruptcy προέρχεται απο το ιταλικο banko rotto ή καπως ετσι γιατι οταν οι moneychangers στις ιταλικες αγορες του μεσαιωνα/αναγεννησησς εμεναν απο ρευστο (χρεοκωπουσαν) ερχονταν οι αρχες και τους εσπαζαν τον παγκο που χρησιμοποιουσαν για τις συναλλαγες τους.
Κυριάκος ο Χρυσογέννητος, του Οίκου των Μητσοτακιδών, Πρώτος του Ονόματός του, Κύριος των Κρητών και των Πρώτων Ελλήνων, Προστάτης της Ελλάδος, Μπαμπάς της Δρακογενιάς, ο Κούλης του Οίνοπα Πόντου, ο Ατσαλάκωτος, ο Απελευθερωτής από τα Δεσμά των Μνημονίων.
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

NewModelArmy έγραψε: 30 Ιουν 2019, 00:42 Ωραιες ιστοριες αυτες με τα απειρα δουκατα,βασιλεια,λοιπα κρατη στη μεσαιωνικη ευρωπη.Αναβιωσαν τις πολεις κρατη της αρχαιας Ελλαδας και για αυτο προοδευσαν ενω στο Βυζαντιο ειχαμε τον καθε βλαχοστρατηγο να κανει μια εξεγερση και να το παιζει εκλεκτος του Θεου
Μη νομίζεις. Και οι συντεχνιακές ρεπούμπλικες με το εντυπωσιακά περίπλοκο καπιταλιστικό σύστημα μέσα στον άγριο μεσαίωνα, ήταν κατα κάποιο τρόπο μια μικρή ανωμαλία- γαλατικό χωριό, η οποία στη Φλωρεντία μπορεί να κράτησε σχεδόν 3 αιώνες αλλά πέρασε μεγάλες περιπέτειες και τελικά την διέκοψαν οριστικά οι πουστογερμανοί το 1530- παρότι πρόλαβε να φήσει τον σπόρο που κατέληξε τελικά στην Ολλανδική επανάσταση, στην Αγγλική και τελικά στη αμερικάνικη :)

επίσης βλέπεις ότι ήταν και οι ίδιοι έτοιμοι να μπουν στην κανονικότητα. Εδώ ελπίζω είναι προφανές ότι το πολίτευμα της Φλωρεντίας που κάλεσε τον δούκα, ήταν ρεπουμπλικάνικο αλλά μόλις οι ποπολάροι εργάτες του μαλλιού είδαν τη διαγραφή χρεών, έτρεξαν να του γλύψουν το πουλί και να φωνάξουν "ζήτω ο Παπαδόπουλος Δούκας των Αθηνών". Εκεί την εποχή υπήρχε στην πόλη μέχρι και ένα είδος συντάγματος, οι λεγόμενες ορντινάντζες, που περιόριζαν τη δύναμη των ευγενών και καθόριζαν κατα κάποιο τρόπο τα δικαιώματα των πληβείων. Αυτά λέει ο Najemy, με την αναμπουμπούλα της φυγής του Δούκα προσπάθησαν να τα σκίσου και να στήσουν τιμοκρατικό καθεστώς αλλά ευτυχώς δεν τράβηξε, κράτησε μόνο κανένα μήνα και και μόλις έπεσε το καθεστώς οι ευγενείς πήραν οριστικά πούλο
Άβαταρ μέλους
Yochanan
Δημοσιεύσεις: 16962
Εγγραφή: 31 Μαρ 2018, 13:44
Phorum.gr user: Yochanan

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Yochanan »

επισης εκανα ενα double take οταν διαβασαν για μαχη του πουατιε αλλα δεν ηταν η γνωστη (η πολυ γνωστη τελος παντνων) αλλα μια αλλη του 100ετους (το διαβασα γουικι)
Κυριάκος ο Χρυσογέννητος, του Οίκου των Μητσοτακιδών, Πρώτος του Ονόματός του, Κύριος των Κρητών και των Πρώτων Ελλήνων, Προστάτης της Ελλάδος, Μπαμπάς της Δρακογενιάς, ο Κούλης του Οίνοπα Πόντου, ο Ατσαλάκωτος, ο Απελευθερωτής από τα Δεσμά των Μνημονίων.
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

Yochanan έγραψε: 30 Ιουν 2019, 00:51 πολυ ωραίο ιστορικο νημα οπως παντα Νερωνα. Για το τελετυαιο ποστ να πω οτι η λεξη bankruptcy προέρχεται απο το ιταλικο banko rotto ή καπως ετσι γιατι οταν οι moneychangers στις ιταλικες αγορες του μεσαιωνα/αναγεννησησς εμεναν απο ρευστο (χρεοκωπουσαν) ερχονταν οι αρχες και τους εσπαζαν τον παγκο που χρησιμοποιουσαν για τις συναλλαγες τους.
δεν ήτανε απλοί moneychangers βιβλικού τύπου ρε συ. Τα έχω πει και σε άλλα νήματα, μιλάμε για κανονικές τράπεζες και εμπορικούς οίκους που έκαναν διεθνές εμπόριο. Για πολύ καιρό η κυρίαρχη άποψη για το πως ξέσπασε κρίση που ήρθε να διαχειριστεί ο Δούκας ήτανε ότι οι 2 μεγάλες τράπεζες στη Φλωρεντία της εποχής είχανε δανείσει μεγάλα ποσά στον Βασιλιά της Αγγλίας οποίος λόγω εκατονταετούς πολέμου δεν μπορούσε να τα εξυπηρετήσει και μείνανε χωρίς ρευστό, που ήταν απαραίτητο για να λειτουργήσει η βιομηχανία μαλλιού, να εισάγονται να πληρώνονται μισθοί(συντάξεις δεν είχε :003: ) ενώ παράλληλα οι ίδιες τράπεζες κατείχαν κρατικά ομόλογα.

Διεθνές πιστωτικό γεγονός δηλαδή
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

απο Najemy
The two republics fought Mastino for three years (1336–8) in an
expensive war in which Florence’s government had to borrow heavily and
increase indirect taxes. According to Villani (12.50) it also enlisted the cooperation
of leading banking companies to bolster communal credit weakened by
prior debts. A committee of ten from major companies was empowered to
raise money and given control of 250,000 florins of gabelle revenues to guarantee
repayment of loans; it assessed loans totaling 100,000 florins, a third of
which came from their own companies, and the remainder from other citizens
who could choose one of three options.

Those willing to lend directly to the
commune were promised 15% annual interest. Citizens preferring not to risk
lending to the commune were invited to extend loans to one of the companies
represented in the committee and receive 8%, while the companies transferred
their loans to the commune and received 5%. Those unable to make the loans
in either manner could cede their obligations to the companies, which made
loans on their behalf and collected interest from both the commune and the
citizens whose debts they assumed.9

For perhaps the first time, the companies here became an integral part of the
commune’s fiscal apparatus, not only by making their own loans and guaranteeing
repayment from gabelle revenues, but also by providing the security
that some lenders needed and by assuming the debts of others. Through these
channels, the companies helped raise revenue for the commune and began
investing more and more of their own assets in government credits from which they earned substantial interest.

They were functioning in effect as banks for the commune; through the committee of ten they also controlled the commune’s
fiscal policies. While the government increasingly depended on the companies
for both direct loans and revenues made possible by securing or assuming
other citizens’ loans, the companies likewise became dependent on the government’s
ability to pay the interest that they in effect had promised themselves.

And that in turn depended on the health of the economy and continued high
receipts from the gabelles. But within a few years gabelle receipts began to
decline.

The gate gabelle, which produced 90,000 florins in 1337–8, yielded
only 65,000 in 1342 and 1343. Taxes on wine sold retail went from 60,000
florins in 1337–8 to 36,000 in 1343.10 Because of dwindling yields, gabelle
purchasers and collectors became more difficult to find.11 The situation worsened
when Florence settled with Mastino in 1341 by buying Lucca for 250,000
florins, which provoked Pisa into war against Florence and triggered another
wave of heavy borrowing, higher debt, and more pressure on the gabelles in a
weakening economy. By the summer of 1341 a major crisis loomed.
Βάλανε τις ιδιωτικές επιχειρήσεις να εγγυηθούν τον κρατικό χρέος και να επενδύσουν και και οι ίδιες σε ομόλογα-εμφαση στο έπεισε: όρισε επιτροπή τεχνοκρατών που ανέλαβε να εκπονήσει σχέδιο και να τους υποσχεθεί κέρδος δεν έβγαλε στη γύρα στρατιώτες να μπαίνουν στα σπίτια και να αρπάζουν πουγγιά με λεφτά και τιμαλφή για να τα λιώσουν

Εικόνα

μπορεί τελικά να κατέληξε σε κανόνι το εγχείρημα αλλά όπως και να χει μιλάμε για πολύ προηγμένα πράγματα
Nero

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Nero »

The pressures that led the oligarchy to intensify its control over both the
institutions and the resources of communal government were perceived in
different terms by the broad middle and lower strata of Florentine merchants
and artisans. The fiscal burden, which called for the increasing imposition
of indirect taxes and forced loans, fell in large measure on the
rank and file of the guild community.

From their point of view, the economy
was being drained in order to salvage the banking companies from the
folly of their own excessive risks and to rescue the commune from its own
aggressive foreign policy.

Consequently, the economic crisis of the companies
produced severe political tensions at home, as the communal councils,
staffed largely by the non-elite members of the guild community,
blocked one proposal for fiscal reform after another in an effort to thwart
what they now saw as the tyrannical and oppressive ambitions of a greedy
oligarchy. It was the effort to overcome this paralysis of communal government
and to bypass the opposition of the councils that led the oligarchy to
engage in a series of emergency gambles that ended in the destruction of
the electoral institutions established in 1328.

The first move in this direction,
and a striking indication of the desperation with which the banking
giants viewed the situation, was the unsuccessful attempt at a coup d'etat
by the Bardi family in November 1340.

Although it was a failure and resulted
in the condemnation of several members of that illustrious house,
the conspiracy did at least signal the unwillingness of some of the most
powerful magnates to continue to support a regime that, however sympathetic
to upper-class interests in general, denied them the right of direct
participation.

https://books.google.gr/books/about/Cor ... edir_esc=y
και κάπου εκεί καλούνε τον Δούκα, ως άλλο ΔΝΤ να αυξήσει τον φπα και να πάρει τα σκληρά μέτρα που ήταν απαραίτητα για τη βιωσιμότητα του χρέους και τη συνέχιση της ρευστότητας, με την ελπίδα ότι όντας ξένος, θα επωμιστεί όλο το πολιτικό βάρος των αντιλαϊκών μέτρων, εν΄παράλληλα κέρδιζαν χρόνο αφού ο Δούκας ήταν πρόσωπο εμπιστοσύνης για τους δανειστές των ιδιωτικών κεφαλαίων, του Ναπολιτάνους :D

#ΑΙΝΕΙΑΝ06
Mole
Δημοσιεύσεις: 1310
Εγγραφή: 02 Απρ 2018, 16:14

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από Mole »

So hab ich dich schon unbedingt
Άβαταρ μέλους
DIOMEDESGR
Δημοσιεύσεις: 6665
Εγγραφή: 24 Οκτ 2018, 19:46
Phorum.gr user: DIOMEDESGR

Re: Ο "Δούκας των Αθηνών"

Μη αναγνωσμένη δημοσίευση από DIOMEDESGR »

Nero έγραψε: 30 Ιουν 2019, 00:38 λίγα γενικά για το πως λειτουργούσε η οικονομία απο τον έγκυρο economist

https://www.economist.com/books-and-art ... capitalism

όταν εμείς είχαμε ακόμα ευνούχους παρακοιμώμενους, αυτοί είχανε perpetual bonds, εμφια, υπέρογκο κρατικό χρέος και υπερχρεωμένες τράπεζες που ξελάσπωνε το κράτος
Πες και για τα Ιδιωτικά Δικαστήρια, τα Ιδιωτικά Πανεπιστήμια, τις Ιδιωτικά προστατευόμενες τέχνες, τους ιδιωτικούς Στρατούς, τους επαγγελματίες Διοικητές που μισθώνονταν από τις πόλεις-κράτη της Ιταλίας για να κυβερνούν με Δημόσια συμβόλαια!

Όταν λέμε Δυτικό Πολιτισμό αυτές όλες τις καταστάσεις που μας θυμίζεις εννοούμε φίλε Nero όχι τα ημέτερα φληναφήματα ότι η ρίζα του Δυτικού Πολιτισμού ήταν οι κλεφταράδες του Περικλή και της Ασπασίας!
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel." Samuel Johnson, 1775.
Απάντηση
  • Παραπλήσια Θέματα
    Απαντήσεις
    Προβολές
    Τελευταία δημοσίευση

Επιστροφή στο “Ιστορία”