Dwarven Blacksmith έγραψε: 19 Νοέμ 2024, 13:44
Αλιόσα έγραψε: 19 Νοέμ 2024, 13:32
nyxtovios έγραψε: 19 Νοέμ 2024, 13:00
H πρόσβαση σε Ιραν και Β.Κορέα είναι τα πιο χρήσιμα όπλα της Ρωσίας. Κυριολεκτικά τζάμπα πυρομαχικά, πύραυλοι, ντρόουν και τώρα και στρατός.
Η Δύση δεν μπορεί να το αντισταθμίσει αυτό.
Τι βλακειες γράφεις ρε τύπε.
Half of Russia's North Korea-Made Artillery Shells Don't Work: Ukraine
https://www.newsweek.com/half-russia-no ... ky-1873612
Αλήθεια θα είναι ε; Για να είναι στο ίντερνετ θα μου πεις...
Δεν ειστε καλά ενημερωμένοι σχετικά με την (αν)αξιοπιστία των βορειοκορεατικών όπλων, διότι απλά είστε τελείως πουτινικοί και δεν ξεχωρίζετε πλέον καθόλου την αλήθεια από το ψέμα.
We need to put the "25% dud rate" figure in context. That figure comes from one unit with one weapons system in one incident one decade ago. It's not clear if that is representative of overall North Korean readiness, for better or for worse.
During the November 2010 Yongpyeong Island attack, a KPA rocket artillery battalion fired about 170 122mm rockets from truck-based BM-11 MRLS at ROK Marine Corps positions and civilian structures.
Only about 80 rockets hit the island itself, with the rest splashing into the water.
Of those that hit 20 failed to detonate, which is where that famous "25% failed to explode" figure comes from. Joseph Bermudez, Jr. has a great report
with more detail on the attack, if you are interested.
Think about all the things this evidence doesn't tell us. It doesn't tell us why almost half the rockets outright missed. Were they warning shots? A case of bad aim? Or faulty rockets? It also doesn't tell us why the rockets that did hit were duds. Bad fuzes? Soft ground? Incorrect settings? Expired warheads? And it certainly doesn't tell us about the reliability of their 107mm 170mm, 122mm, or 152mm shells from tube-fired guns.
https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/com ... nreliable/
έχουνε παράδοση στα τζουφια
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineConflic ... explosion/