Ίσως έγραφε με ψευδώνυμο

Ίσως έγραφε με ψευδώνυμο

Kαι ποιός γραφικός (και άσχετος) θα μπορούσε να θεωρήσει αυτό το κείμενο ως υπέρ του Πολ Ποτ;
ο ιδιος που θεωρεί πως η σφαγή των κομμουνιστων στην ινδονησια δεν εγινε με γνώση των ΗΠΑ, επειδή Πολ Ποτ.Maspoli έγραψε: 22 Αύγ 2018, 11:55Kαι ποιός γραφικός (και άσχετος) θα μπορούσε να θεωρήσει αυτό το κείμενο ως υπέρ του Πολ Ποτ;
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/p ... l-pot-handIn dropping the equivalent of five Hiroshimas on a peasant society, Nixon and Kissinger killed an estimated half a million people. Year Zero began, in effect, with them; the bombing was a catalyst for the rise of a small sectarian group, the Khmer Rouge, whose combination of Maoism and medievalism had no popular base.
After two and a half years in power, the Khmer Rouge was overthrown by the Vietnamese on Christmas Day, 1978. In the months and years that followed, the US and China and their allies, notably the Thatcher government, backed Pol Pot in exile in Thailand. He was the enemy of their enemy: Vietnam, whose liberation of Cambodia could never be recognised because it had come from the wrong side of the cold war. For the Americans, now backing Beijing against Moscow, there was also a score to be settled for their humiliation on the rooftops of Saigon.
To this end, the United Nations was abused by the powerful. Although the Khmer Rouge government ("Democratic Kampuchea") had ceased to exist in January 1979, its representatives were allowed to continue occupying Cambodia's seat at the UN; indeed, the US, China and Britain insisted on it. Meanwhile, a Security Council embargo on Cambodia compounded the suffering of a traumatised nation, while the Khmer Rouge in exile got almost everything it wanted. In 1981, President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said: "I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot." The US, he added, "winked publicly" as China sent arms to the Khmer Rouge.
Κάποιος με ισχυρή πρεσβυωπία, που δεν παρατήρησε το "θεωρούμενος ως υπεύθυνος", τα κοροϊδευτικά εισαγωγικά στο "για δύο εκατομμύρια θανάτους" και το ειρωνικό "δηλώνει επιχαίρων".
ναι, αλλά για την συνθήκη Μολότωφ - Ρίμπεντροπ δεν λες τιποτα.Maspoli έγραψε: 22 Αύγ 2018, 12:03 Διαβάζω από το Ριζοσπάστη προφανώς
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/p ... l-pot-handIn dropping the equivalent of five Hiroshimas on a peasant society, Nixon and Kissinger killed an estimated half a million people. Year Zero began, in effect, with them; the bombing was a catalyst for the rise of a small sectarian group, the Khmer Rouge, whose combination of Maoism and medievalism had no popular base.
After two and a half years in power, the Khmer Rouge was overthrown by the Vietnamese on Christmas Day, 1978. In the months and years that followed, the US and China and their allies, notably the Thatcher government, backed Pol Pot in exile in Thailand. He was the enemy of their enemy: Vietnam, whose liberation of Cambodia could never be recognised because it had come from the wrong side of the cold war. For the Americans, now backing Beijing against Moscow, there was also a score to be settled for their humiliation on the rooftops of Saigon.
To this end, the United Nations was abused by the powerful. Although the Khmer Rouge government ("Democratic Kampuchea") had ceased to exist in January 1979, its representatives were allowed to continue occupying Cambodia's seat at the UN; indeed, the US, China and Britain insisted on it. Meanwhile, a Security Council embargo on Cambodia compounded the suffering of a traumatised nation, while the Khmer Rouge in exile got almost everything it wanted. In 1981, President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said: "I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot." The US, he added, "winked publicly" as China sent arms to the Khmer Rouge.
Και τώρα άσχετε παππού σύρε να χορέψεις
Ωπ! να τον Στάλιν!
Maspoli έγραψε: 22 Αύγ 2018, 12:03 Διαβάζω από το Ριζοσπάστη προφανώς
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/p ... l-pot-handSpoiler
In dropping the equivalent of five Hiroshimas on a peasant society, Nixon and Kissinger killed an estimated half a million people. Year Zero began, in effect, with them; the bombing was a catalyst for the rise of a small sectarian group, the Khmer Rouge, whose combination of Maoism and medievalism had no popular base.
After two and a half years in power, the Khmer Rouge was overthrown by the Vietnamese on Christmas Day, 1978. In the months and years that followed, the US and China and their allies, notably the Thatcher government, backed Pol Pot in exile in Thailand. He was the enemy of their enemy: Vietnam, whose liberation of Cambodia could never be recognised because it had come from the wrong side of the cold war. For the Americans, now backing Beijing against Moscow, there was also a score to be settled for their humiliation on the rooftops of Saigon.
To this end, the United Nations was abused by the powerful. Although the Khmer Rouge government ("Democratic Kampuchea") had ceased to exist in January 1979, its representatives were allowed to continue occupying Cambodia's seat at the UN; indeed, the US, China and Britain insisted on it. Meanwhile, a Security Council embargo on Cambodia compounded the suffering of a traumatised nation, while the Khmer Rouge in exile got almost everything it wanted. In 1981, President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said: "I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot." The US, he added, "winked publicly" as China sent arms to the Khmer Rouge.
Cloud87 έγραψε: 22 Αύγ 2018, 12:14 Ολόκληρη η ιστορία του ψυχρού πολέμο συνοψίζεται ως εξής: Ενας καρχιαρίας μαλώνει με έναν κροκόδειλο.

Μιλάμε τινάζει ο τύπος το γραφικόμετρο πέρα κι από την ιονόσφαιραSaliveros έγραψε: 22 Αύγ 2018, 12:12
Τη γενοκτονία του Πολ Ποτ την κάνουν γαργάρα, το τι έγινε μετά την εκδίωξή του τους μάρανε...
Ποιός ήταν ο Ieng Sary;"We are not communists ... we are revolutionaries" who do not 'belong to the commonly accepted grouping of communist Indochina."(Ieng Sary, 1977, quoted by Vickery, Cambodia: 1978-1983, p. 288).