Καλώς ήρθατε στο Phorum.com.gr Είμαστε εδώ πολλά ενεργά μέλη της διαδικτυακής κοινότητας του Phorum.gr που έκλεισε. Σας περιμένουμε όλους!
https://dev.phorum.com.gr/
0.00 –
No offside, penalty kick – 2014 UEFA explanation.
Reason:
As the ball is clearly clearly not going anywhere near the players involved then the attacker cannot be considered as challenging the defender for ball. Therefore there cannot be an offside offence. Being in an offside position is not an infringement itself, but a clear holding by the defender is.
0.27 –
Offside – 2015 spring, explanation in UEFA/FIFA RAP course.
Reason:
The attacker must be considered as challenging an opponent for the ball. The attacker and the defender are dueling for position and the ball is coming directly towards them. The defender fouls the opponent after the ball has been played and as the attacker is making a clear attempt to play the ball.
0.47 –
Offside – 2016 spring, explanation in UEFA/FIFA RAP course.
Reason:
The attacker must be considered as challenging an opponent for the ball. The defender probably has a hold of the opponent before the ball is played, but the foul is commited after the ball has been played and as the attacker is making a clear attempt to play the ball.
1.07 –
No explanation yet – 2016 november.
Offside Explained verdict:
Based on the 3 previous clips we argue that the attacker is correctly ruled offside, the referees made a correct decision and followed the given UEFA guidelines.
There are arguments that when we consider the changes to the Law (starting 01.06.2016) then as there seems to be a simultaneous offence then „the more serious offence” must be punished and a penalty kick should be awarded.
We argue that this is not the case as the offside infringement happens before the foul is committed (as in the 3 last situations in our video). The holding first starts after the ball has been played and a clear offence worthy of a penalty kick is committed as the ball is already nearing the players involved. For it to be a penalty kick then in such situation a clear offence should occur before the ball is played (or in some cases as the ball is played), because after the ball has been played the players can be considered as challenging for the ball.
When you look at the actions of the attacker then he is in a positional duel with the defender. The attacker uses his body in a legal manner to block the path of defender and to win the duel with the defender. But as he is in an offside position then he is involved in active play and the offside offence occurs before the foul is committed.
The Law does not always state clearly when an attacker can be penalised for offside. In some cases it happens when the attacker plays the ball, but in cases where the attacker is challening and opponent for the ball (as it happens in most cases when he is fouled) then it is in the opinion of the referee to judge when an offside offence occurs.
When you add the non-written Law 18 (Common Sense) to it then this is the reason why UEFA and FIFA have clearly stated that the whole football community does not want a penalty given in favour of an attacker who is coming from an offside position and is challenging the defender for the ball.
Μπορώ να διαλέξω και το Γ, όπως είπα όμως για τη συγκεκριμένη φάση λέω το Α. Εσύ μπορείς να μου πεις γιατί δεν ισχύει το Α;GoBack έγραψε: 08 Νοέμ 2020, 17:36 Υπαρχει καποιος λογος που διαλεγεις το Α αντι του Β περα απο το οτι εισαι γαυρος;
Συμφωνα με το βιντεο που εβαλα παραπανω η ουεφα δικαιολογει την αποφαση σου λογω του χρονικου σημειου που γινεται η παραβαση.
Αποδέξου ότι ο Βαγγέλας σας γλεντάει και με δική σας ΕΠΟ και μην κουράζεις το μυαλουδάκι σου.GoBack έγραψε: 08 Νοέμ 2020, 16:57 https://www.novasports.gr/web-tv/podosf ... to-penalti
Ο παικτης του ΟΦΗ βρισκεται σε θεση οφσαιντ,πριν η μπαλα φτασει σε αυτον ο αμυντικος τον ανατρεπει.Τι προβλεπει ο κανονισμος;
Τι σκέψεις;GoBack έγραψε: 08 Νοέμ 2020, 17:49 Αλλα και παλι οι περιπτωσεις αυτες δεν καλυπτουν πληρως τη φαση.
prepon namrail σκεψεις;