Phorum.com.gr

Northern Spirit έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 13:51

Dwarven Blacksmith έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 13:28

Northern Spirit έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 13:13 θα πρεπει να μαθουμε να ζουμε με τον ιο..

Αντί για νεκρους θα ανακοινώνουμε "ανεπίδεκτους μαθήσεως".

Μπορουμε να βαλουμε τους νεκρους απο τον ιο σε μια λιστα με τους νεκρους απο αλλες ασθενειες. Πχ.

1. Καρκινος τοσοι
2. Απλη γριπη τοσοι
3. Καρδια τοσοι
4. Αλτζαχαιμερ τοσοι
5. Ατυχηματα τοσοι
6. Κορονοιος τοσοι,

Ετσι θα μειωθει και η εμμονη με τον ιο.

Σπανοβαγγελοδημήτρης έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 23:51 Πεθαίνεις από Αλτζχάιμερ;

Σπανοβαγγελοδημήτρης έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 23:51 Πεθαίνεις από Αλτζχάιμερ;

OANNHSEA έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 11:44

perseus έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 08:46

. Π.χ. ψυχολογικά - μετά την καραντίνα ξέρετε πόσοι θα πάρουν τα οχήματα τους και θα τρέξουν εις τα εξοχάς και εις τα παραλίας;;; Τρέξουν - σαν παλαβοί, με ότι αυτό συνεπάγεται...

Αν καποιος πρεπει να κατσει 1 μηνα σπιτι και να καβλαντιζει και παθαινει ψυχολογικα τοτε ειναι φυρα και στο καλο να παει.

Δεν έχεις καταλάβει πόσο βαρύ ψυχολογικό χτύπημα είναι ο ιός...
Θα στο πω αλλιώς:
Το 2010 είχαμε την αρχή της κρίσης. Έχεις ιδέα πόσοι άνθρωποι έπεσαν ψυχολογικά, ακόμα και όταν δεν είχαν οικονομικό πρόβλημα;
Ξέρεις ποιές περιοχές έπαιρναν τα πιο πολλά ψυχοφάρμακα και δη βαριά αντικαταθλιπτικά; Τα βόρεια προάστια, τα νότια προάστια και το Περιστέρι!!!
Κύρια αιτία ότι έσπασε όλο αυτό το παραμύθι που τους πουλούσαν επί 30 χρόνια!!!

Ε λοιπόν άλλο τόσο βαρύ παραμύθι είναι τα:
"είσαστε αθάνατοι, δεν χρειάζεται να φοβάστε τίποτα", που σας πουλούσαν επί 80+ χρόνια τώρα...
"έχετε δημοκρατία, μπορείτε να πάτε και να κάνετε ότι θέλετε"

OANNHSEA έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 11:44Ε λοιπόν άλλο τόσο βαρύ παραμύθι είναι τα:
"είσαστε αθάνατοι, δεν χρειάζεται να φοβάστε τίποτα", που σας πουλούσαν επί 80+ χρόνια τώρα...

Jack Shephard έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 23:04 Πρέπει να πίστευε ότι δεν ήταν κάτι πολύ σοβαρό και να το υποτίμησε.

LETO έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 22:04 θα κανεις το εμβολιο

dna replication έγραψε: 07 Απρ 2020, 00:41 Mad Max I

https://twitter.com/Gerrrty/status/1247210316255150081

Χουργιατς έγραψε: 06 Απρ 2020, 21:54
1. θυμίζω στους φίλους μας πως όταν ξεκίνησαν τα λαηβστρημ από την μαρτυρική γουχαν, δεν είδαμε παπάκια ή φορτηγά στους δρόμους, μα ακριβά αυτοκίνητα να κινουνται κατά μόνας, αυτοκίνητα στιβαρά, υπόπτως όμοια με κάτι τέσλα

School closures have little impact on spread of coronavirus – study
UCL say small benefits should be weighed against profound economic and social costs


The gates of Carew Academy in Wallington, Surrey, decorated with rainbow signs during the lockdown. Photograph: Getty Images
School closures are likely to have a relatively small impact on the spread of Covid-19 and should be weighed against their profound economic and social consequences, particularly for the most vulnerable children, according to a UK study.

The research, led by University College London (UCL), is the first to look at evidence behind many governments’ decision to shut schools and keep pupils at home.

According to the UN’s education body, Unesco, more than 90% of the world’s pupils have been affected by closures.

The UCL-led study concludes that the evidence to support the closure of schools to combat Covid-19 is “very weak”, and statistics from influenza outbreaks suggest school closures “could have relatively small effects on a virus with Covid-19’s high transmissibility and apparent low clinical effect on schoolchildren”.

The research team reviewed 16 studies of recent outbreaks of other coronaviruses, including the 2003 Sars epidemic in mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore, and found that school closures did not help control the epidemic.

“We know from previous studies that school closures are likely to have the greatest effect if the virus has low transmissibility and attack rates are higher in children. This is the opposite of Covid-19,” said the study’s lead author, Prof Russell Viner, of UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health.

“Data on the benefit of school closures in the Covid-19 outbreak is limited but what we know shows that their impact is likely to be only small compared with other infection-control measures such as case isolation and is only effective when other social isolating measures are adhered to.”


UK councils face lawsuits over access to education in lockdown
Read more
Viner, who is president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said the benefit gained from closing schools had to be weighed against the costs. “Children’s education is damaged and their mental health may suffer, family finances are affected, key workers may need to stay home to look after children and vulnerable children may suffer most.”

He also highlighted the need to start working out how to return students to education and keep them in school safely.

“Countries that have closed schools, such as the UK, have to now ask hard questions about when and how to open schools. Interventions in schools, such as closing playgrounds, keeping students in constant class groups/classrooms, increasing spacing between students in classes, reducing the school week and staggering school start and break times across years or classes should be considered if restrictive social distancing policies are to be implemented for long periods of time.”


Prof Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College London, who is one of the key epidemiologists advising the government, said: “While school closure as a measure on its own is predicted to have a limited effectiveness in controlling Covid-19 transmission, when combined with intense social distancing it plays an important role in severing remaining contacts between households and thus ensuring transmission declines.”

Robert Dingwall, a professor of sociology at Nottingham Trent University, said the UCL study suggested the public health benefits of school closures were not proportionate to the social and economic costs imposed on children and their families.

“It also underlines how the assumptions used in modelling the Covid-19 pandemic may rest on very flimsy foundations in terms of scientific evidence. This work suggests that UK schools could and should begin to reopen as soon as practicable after the initial wave of cases has passed through.”



Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter
Read more
The study team included researchers from UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL Institute of Education, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, University of Cambridge and University of Sydney. The study is published in the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health journal.

A government spokesperson said: “The decision to close schools was taken in line with scientific advice on how to limit the spread of the coronavirus. We asked most children to stay at home in order to protect the NHS and save lives.

“Schools will remain closed until further notice, except for children of critical workers and the children who are most vulnerable. We will reopen schools when the scientific advice indicates it is safe to do so.”