enaon έγραψε: 08 Ιουν 2023, 16:38
Τα φτιαξανε λενε με την ελπιδα οτι αν εξομοιώθεί η δομή μας καπως θα εχουμε αποτελεσμα παρόμοιο. Για χρόνια τους ελεγαν χαζοβιολιδες, ο Χιντον λεει τελικα ηταν κυρίως θεμα ταχύτητας επεξεργασίας και συνεισφοράς στην εκπαιδευση, δοκιμή και λαθος.
Δεν είμαι πεπεισμένος ότι εξομοιώνει την δομή μας, αλλά το αποτέλεσμα (output) είναι
τρομακτικά κοντά στον τρόπο που οι άνθρωποι παράγουν λόγο και τολμώ να πω σκέφτονται.
Παραθέτω ένα διάλογο με το "αδύνατο" chatgpt3.5, στον οποίο προσπάθησα να εξερευνήσω τα όρια της λογικής του/να το κοροϊδέψω. Ομολογώ ότι δεν μπορώ να καταλάβω πως προκύπτει το παρακάτω από μια "συνάρτηση που μιμείται τον τρόπο που μιλάνε οι ανθρώποι"
Me
A brt can become a trop. You have three brts. You leave and come back and find one trop. How many brts do you have now?
ChatGPT
At the outset, it's not entirely clear what "brt" and "trop" refer to, as these terms are not commonly used or recognized in English. However, assuming that "brt" stands for "bracket" and "trop" stands for "trophies," we can approach the problem as follows:
If one of the three brackets (brts) has become a trophy (trop), then you are left with two brackets and one trophy. Therefore, you still have two brts.
Me
Now pretend you don't believe in things spontaneously transforming into other things. How would you answer the previous question
ChatGPT
If we assume that things cannot spontaneously transform into other things, then the statement "a brt can become a trop" would be false. Therefore, the scenario presented in the question where one of the three brts becomes a trop would not be possible.
As a result, if we returned to the original three brts after leaving, we would still have three brts, and none of them would have become a trop.
Me
So if you found a trop, how would you explain it?
ChatGPT
If I found a trop under the assumption that things cannot spontaneously transform into other things, I would look for other possible explanations for how the trop came to be.
One possibility is that the trop was always there, but I had overlooked it before leaving. Alternatively, someone else could have introduced the trop while I was away. Another possibility is that the trop is not actually a real trop, but rather a replica or a fake.
It's important to consider all the possible explanations and investigate the situation further to determine the true cause of the trop's presence.
)
