Phorum.com.gr

πατησιωτης έγραψε: 11 Μάιος 2024, 22:12 https://twitter.com/revishvilig/status/ ... 1574800895

πατησιωτης έγραψε: 11 Μάιος 2024, 22:12 https://twitter.com/revishvilig/status/ ... 1574800895

sharp έγραψε: 12 Μάιος 2024, 01:14 Δώστου χελώνε, παναμαςπαρουν και τη Γεωργία. Οι Δυτικοί φασίστες, οι ναζί

dna replication έγραψε: 12 Μάιος 2024, 01:56 https://twitter.com/CivilGe/status/1789350588569764168

sharp έγραψε: 12 Μάιος 2024, 01:34 Νευράκια; Δες κανά νευρολόγο, τό έχεις τεράστια ανάγκη.

The US law makes no assumption that an organization or a person receiving funds from a foreign power is a foreign agent. The Georgian law assumes that only receiving foreign funds makes an organization a foreign agent. This is an extremely important difference. Georgian organizations which act only in Georgia’s interest – in providing benefits to its population – are labeled foreign agents. In America, individuals and organizations who receive foreign funds and carry out activities that benefit Americans are not labelled “foreign agents.” They are foreign agents only if they act on the specific instructions of a foreign principal.

While many of us have called the Georgian law a “Russian law,” it is notable that the Russian law (like the US law) exempts religious organizations from its coverage. That would indicate that the Russian government is more tolerant on the subject of religious freedom than the Georgian government. The Georgian law’s apparently intentional decision to not exempt religious organizations, when the US and Russian laws do so, raises serious questions about the motivation for this particular legislative choice: against which religions and religious organizations will the Georgian foreign agents law be enforced?

They are foreign agents only if they act on the specific instructions of a foreign principal.