Από φιλοσιωνιστικό telegram
So, what's going on with President Trump?
Let's delve into President Trump's mindset to understand his motivations and the reasoning behind his advocacy for this deal.
Throughout his election campaign, Trump promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict and secure the release of hostages held by Hamas before taking office. With only six days left until January 20th, there is no visible strategy to resolve the Russia-Ukraine war. Should the hostages remain unreturned by January 21st, Trump risks becoming a subject of ridicule and embarrassment, potentially undermining his credibility and the weight of his future pronouncements.
Regarding the deal, Trump is aware that releasing thousands of terrorists and returning control of Gaza to its residents, whom he might view with disdain, are problematic actions. However, becoming a figure of mockery is even more detrimental, not just to his ego but because it signals to Iran and its allies that his threats carry no weight. This could embolden them to act with impunity over the next four years. Therefore, he must first assert his dominance on the global stage to ensure compliance from all parties.
Once established as a formidable leader, Trump could collaborate with Israel to dismantle the Iranian nuclear program, neutralize the Houthis, and eradicate remaining Hamas and Hezbollah elements worldwide. For any violation by Hamas, he might permit Israel to occupy parts of Gaza; for each terrorist attack, he could allow annexation of Judea and Samaria territories, and potentially the Syrian Mount Hermon.
The challenge of recapturing all released terrorists would be significant, but navigating four years with a weakened and anxious Trump would be even more daunting. Israel must acknowledge Trump's role in the hostage release to gain his support for aggressive actions in the Middle East.
In an ideal scenario, one might hope Hamas rejects the deal, prompting Trump, on January 21st, to react with fury and allow Israel to act unilaterally against Middle Eastern threats without regard for international law. This would restore his image of strength. However, if Trump faces a 'no' from Israel on January 20th, he might be seen globally as another president unable to influence Israel, fostering not only his personal resentment but also international perceptions of his weakness, which could harm Israeli interests.
In conclusion, cooperation with this regrettable deal might be necessary. It would be imperative to then aggressively pursue the recapture of released terrorists and dismantle Iran and its proxies, leveraging Trump's support for a more assertive Middle Eastern policy.
https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/48071