Κορονοϊός από την κινα

[Arisvilla]

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-ire ... s-12470162
Εντωμεταξύ τα νυχτερινά κέντρα και οι παμπ που κλείνουν τα μεσάνυχτα στην Ιρλανδία πριν από εναμιση μήνα ανοιξαν. Αλλά εδώ οι Κούληδες μας έλεγαν οτι με το εμβόλιο θα πάρουμε τις ζωές μας πίσω και δεν χρειάζονται οριζόντια μέτρα και οτι η μόνη λύση είναι το εμβόλιο. Πήγε και στον Μπορις προχθές ο βασιλιάς της γκαντεμιάς και πήρε το know how για την ανοσία της αγέλης.

[Dwarven Blacksmith]

Μπορουμε παρακαλω να ποσταρουμε νεα με αυθεντικες πηγες, και κυριως οχι απο σκουπιδια οπως το Προνιουζ ?
ευχαριστω.

Δεν θα ήταν φοβερά περίεργο πάντως αν ίσχυε, ούτε κάτι κακό.

Αυτό θα ήταν το ιδανικό σενάριο, αν οι θάνατοι από τον ιό πλησιάσουν το μηδέν (λόγω εμβολιων και zero-cvoid lockdowns), ΠΡΟΦΑΝΩΣ και θα υπάρχουν περισσότεροι θάνατοι από παρανέργειες. Αυτό είναι κάτι το εξαιρετικά θετικό. Σα να λέμε μηδενίσαμε τα εργατικά ατυχήματα από πτώση τούβλων αλλά πέρυσι ένας πνίγηκε από το λουρί του κράνους. Working as intended.

[GoBack]

Λιγο δυσκολο αυτο απο τη στιγμη που οι θανατοι απο τα εμβολια ειναι 0

[Dwarven Blacksmith]

Λιγο δυσκολο αυτο απο τη στιγμη που οι θανατοι απο τα εμβολια ειναι 0

Είπαμε, δεν αξιολογώ τον ισχυρισμό. Απλά λέω ότι μακάρι.

[GoBack]

Λιγο δυσκολο αυτο απο τη στιγμη που οι θανατοι απο τα εμβολια ειναι 0

Είπαμε, δεν αξιολογώ τον ισχυρισμό. Απλά λέω ότι μακάρι.

Με επιλεκτικη ευθανασια επιτυγχανεται ευκολοτερα παντως.

[Dwarven Blacksmith]

Λιγο δυσκολο αυτο απο τη στιγμη που οι θανατοι απο τα εμβολια ειναι 0

Είπαμε, δεν αξιολογώ τον ισχυρισμό. Απλά λέω ότι μακάρι.

Με επιλεκτικη ευθανασια επιτυγχανεται ευκολοτερα παντως.

Pitch it.

[GoBack]

Είπαμε, δεν αξιολογώ τον ισχυρισμό. Απλά λέω ότι μακάρι.

Με επιλεκτικη ευθανασια επιτυγχανεται ευκολοτερα παντως.

Pitch it.

Με το που πιανουν κοβιντ οσοι ταιριαζουν στο προφιλ της βαριας νοσηλειας τους παταμε μια ευθανασια και προμπλεμ σολβντ πριν προλαβει να τους παρει ο ιος

[Arisvilla]

https://www.newsit.gr/kosmos/koronoios- ... a/3409921/
Ολλανδία 85% ενηλίκων πλήρως εμβολιασμένοι.
https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/1 ... -are-they/
Bέλγιο 82% των ενηλίκων πλήρως εμβολιασμένοι
Και κάποιοι εδώ υπερασπιστές της κουλοπολιτικής λένε τα δικά τους.

[Dwarven Blacksmith]

Με επιλεκτικη ευθανασια επιτυγχανεται ευκολοτερα παντως.

Pitch it.

Με το που πιανουν κοβιντ οσοι ταιριαζουν στο προφιλ της βαριας νοσηλειας τους παταμε μια ευθανασια και προμπλεμ σολβντ πριν προλαβει να τους παρει ο ιος

Ευθανασία είναι μόνο αν συμφωνούν οι ίδιοι. Αν είναι ανεμβολίαστοι βέβαια το λογικό είναι να συμφωνούν, θα γλιτώσουν και τη διασωλήνωση.

[GoBack]

Pitch it.

Με το που πιανουν κοβιντ οσοι ταιριαζουν στο προφιλ της βαριας νοσηλειας τους παταμε μια ευθανασια και προμπλεμ σολβντ πριν προλαβει να τους παρει ο ιος

Ευθανασία είναι μόνο αν συμφωνούν οι ίδιοι. Αν είναι ανεμβολίαστοι βέβαια το λογικό είναι να συμφωνούν, θα γλιτώσουν και τη διασωλήνωση.

Οι κακες γλωσσες παντως λενε οτι στη Σουηδια στο πρωτο κυμα δεν τους ρωταγαν κιολας

[Dwarven Blacksmith]

Με το που πιανουν κοβιντ οσοι ταιριαζουν στο προφιλ της βαριας νοσηλειας τους παταμε μια ευθανασια και προμπλεμ σολβντ πριν προλαβει να τους παρει ο ιος

Ευθανασία είναι μόνο αν συμφωνούν οι ίδιοι. Αν είναι ανεμβολίαστοι βέβαια το λογικό είναι να συμφωνούν, θα γλιτώσουν και τη διασωλήνωση.

Οι κακες γλωσσες παντως λενε οτι στη Σουηδια στο πρωτο κυμα δεν τους ρωταγαν κιολας

Τι να σου πω, δεν κάνω παρέα με κακές γλώσσες. Ακολουθώ τη συμβουλή του παπά του χωριού που μου είπε να κόψω τους τοξικούς ανθρώπους από τη ζωή μου.

[GoBack]

Ευθανασία είναι μόνο αν συμφωνούν οι ίδιοι. Αν είναι ανεμβολίαστοι βέβαια το λογικό είναι να συμφωνούν, θα γλιτώσουν και τη διασωλήνωση.

Οι κακες γλωσσες παντως λενε οτι στη Σουηδια στο πρωτο κυμα δεν τους ρωταγαν κιολας

Τι να σου πω, δεν κάνω παρέα με κακές γλώσσες. Ακολουθώ τη συμβουλή του παπά του χωριού που μου είπε να κόψω τους τοξικούς ανθρώπους από τη ζωή μου.

anyway,δεν χρειαζεται να την κανουμε υποχρεωτικη την ευθανασια,αρκει να τους πιεσουμε αρκετα μεχρι να συμφωνησουν

[AlienWay]

Εδώ ένας γερουσιαστής γλεντάει τον cancerman. Να πάνε να πνιγούν, μλκ. Ξοδεύουν εκατομμύρια για να δημιουργήσουν πανδημίες in vitro και αυτό το ονομάζουν "έρευνα".

[Who is The 4th man]

Εδώ ένας γερουσιαστής γλεντάει τον cancerman. Να πάνε να πνιγούν, μλκ. Ξοδεύουν εκατομμύρια για να δημιουργήσουν πανδημίες in vitro και αυτό το ονομάζουν "έρευνα".

είναι ό Γερουσιαστης Dr Randal Haward Paul
εδω οι ερωτησεις/απαντησεις για να τις δουμε μαζι με την αυτοματη μεταφρ που δεν ειναι καλη

SENATOR PAUL. >> DR. FAUCI, I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO SAY TODAY THAT YOU APPROVED OF GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN BUT YOUR REPEATED DENIALS HAVE WORN THIN AND THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS FRANKLY DON'T BELIEVE YOU. EVEN THE NIH NOW ADMITS THAT ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE DID PERFORM EXPERIMENTS IN WUHAN THAT CREATED VIRUSES NOT FOUND IN NATURE THAT ACTUALLY DID GAIN IN LETHALITY. THE FACTS ARE CLEAR. THE NIH DID FUND GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN DESPITE YOUR PROTESTATIONS. YOU CAN DENY IT ALL YOU WANT BUT EVEN THE CHINESE AUTHORS OF THE PAPER IN THEIR PAPER ADMIT THAT VIRUSES NOT FOUND IN NATURE WERE CREATED AND YES, THEY GAINED IN INFECTIVITY. YOUR PERSISTENT DENIALS THOUGH ARE NOT SIMPLY A STAIN ON YOUR REPUTATION BUT ARE A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE COUNTRY AND TO THE WORLD. AS PROFESSOR ESSFELT OF MIT HAS WRITTEN, GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH LOOKS LIKE A GAMBLE THAT CIVILIZATION CAN'T AFFORD TO RISK YET HERE WE ARE AGAIN WITH YOU STEADFAST IN YOUR DENIALS. IT WHY DOES IT MATTER? BECAUSE GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH WITH LABORATORY CREATED VIRUSES NOT FOUND IN NATURE COULD CAUSE A PANDEMIC EVEN WORSE THE NEXT TIME. WE'RE SUFFERING TODAY FROM ONE THAT HAS A MORTALITY OF APPROXIMATELY 1%. THEY'RE EXPERIMENTING WITH VIRUSES THAT HAVE MORTALITIES BETWEEN 15 AND 50%. YES, OUR CIVILIZATION COULD BE AT RISK FROM ONE OF THESE VIRUSES. IT'S INCREDIBLY RISKY. EXPERIMENTS THAT COMBINE UNKNOWN VIRUSES WITH CORONAVIRUSES WITH AS MUCH AS 15% MORTALITY COULD ENDANGER CIVILIZATION AS WE KNOW IT. YET HERE YOU SIT, UNWILLING TO ACCEPT ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PANDEMIC AND UNWILLING TO TAKE STEPS TO PREVENT GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH FROM POSSIBLY UNLEASHING A DEADLY VIRUS. YOU MISLEAD THE PUBLIC BY SAYING THAT THE PUBLISHED VIRUSES COULD NOT BE COVID. WELL, EXACTLY NO ONE IS ALLEGING THAT. NO ONE IS ALLEGING THAT THE PUBLISHED VIRUSES BY THE CHINESE ARE COVID. WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS THAT THIS WAS RISKY TYPE OF RESEARCH, GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH, IT WAS RISKY TO SHARE THIS WITH THE CHINESE AND THAT COVID MAY HAVE BEEN CREATED FROM A NOT YET VIRUS. WE DON'T YET ANTICIPATE THE CHINESE ARE GOING TO REVEAL THE VIRUS IF IT CAME FROM THEIR LAB. YOU KNOW THAT BUT YOU CONTINUE TO MISLEAD. YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT NIH MONEY GOING TO WUHAN. YOU CONTINUE TO SAY YOU TRUST THE CHINESE SCIENTISTS. YOU APPEAR TO HAVE LEARNED NOTHING FROM THIS PANDEMIC. WILL YOU TODAY FINALLY TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR FUNDING GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN? >> SENATOR, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I DISAGREE WITH SO MANY OF THE THINGS THAT YOU'VE SAID. FIRST OF ALL, GAIN OF FUNCTION IS A VERY NEBULOUS TERM. WE HAVE SPENT, NOT US BUT OUTSIDE BODIES, A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF EFFORT TO GIVE A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION TO THE TYPE OF RESEARCH THAT IS OF CONCERN THAT MIGHT LEAD TO A DANGEROUS SITUATION. YOU ARE AWARE OF THAT. THAT IS CALLED P3C0. >> WE'RE AWARE THAT YOU DELETED GAIN OF FUNCTION TO THE NIH WEBSITE. >> I CAN GET BACK TO THAT IN A MOMENT IF WE HAVE TIME. BUT LET'S GET BACK TO THE OPERATING FRAMEWORK AND GUIDE RAILS WHICH WE OPERATE UNDER. AND YOU HAVE IGNORED THEM. THE GUIDELINES ARE VERY, VERY CLEAR, THAT YOU HAVE TO BE DEALING WITH A PATHOGEN THAT CLEARLY IS SHOWN AND VERY LIKELY TO BE HIGHLY TRANSMISSIBLE IN AN UNCONTROLLABLE WAY IN HUMANS AND TO HAVE A HIGH DELVE MOREL DEGREE OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY, AND YOU DO EXPERIMENTS TO ENHANCE THAT, HENCE THE WORD EPPP, ENHANCED PATHOGENS -- >> -- TOOK THE VIRUS AND COMBINED IT WITH WIV1 AND CALLS A RECOMBINANT VIRUS THAT DOESN'T EXIST IN NATURE AND IT MADE MICE SICKER. YOU'RE SAYING THAT'S NOT GAIN OF FUNCTION RESEARCH. >> ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES -- >> YOU'RE SIMPLY SAYING IT DOESN'T EXIST BECAUSE YOU CHANGED THE DEFINITION ON THE NIH WEBSITE. THIS IS TERRIBLE AND YOU'RE COMPLETELY TRYING TO ESCAPE THE IDEA THAT WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT TRYING TO PREVENT A PANDEMIC FROM LEAKING FROM A LAB. THERE IS THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT POINTS TO COMING FROM A LAB AND YOU'VE CHANGED THE DEFINITION ON THE WEBSITE TO TRY TO COVER YOUR ASS, BASICALLY. THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE DONE, YOU'VE CHANGED THE WEBSITE TO CHANGE THE DEFINITION THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE THE RISKY RESEARCH THAT'S GOING ON. UNTIL YOU ADMIT IT'S RISKY, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET ANYWHERE. THE NIH HAS NOW REBUKED THEM, YOUR OWN AGENCY HAS REBUKED THEM. YOU'RE STILL UNWILLING TO ADMIT THAT THEY GAINED IN FUNCTION WHEN YOU SAY THEY BECAME SICKER. THEY GAINED IN LETHALITY. IT'S A NEW VIRUS. THAT'S NOT GAIN OF FUNCTION? >> ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION THAT IS CURRENTLY OPERABLE -- YOU KNOW, SENATOR, LET'S MAKE IT CLEAR FOR THE PEOPLE WHO ARE LISTENING. THE CURRENT DEFINITION WAS DONE OVER -- TO THREE-YEAR PERIOD BY OUTSIDE BODIES INCLUDING THE NSABB, TWO CONFERENCES BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE, ON DECEMBER 2014, MARCH 2016. WE COMMISSIONED EXTERNAL RISK/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ON JANUARY OF 2017. THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, THE WHITE HOUSE, ISSUED THE CURRENT POLICY. >> AND COINCIDENTALLY -- >> I HAVE NOT CHANGED ANY DEFINITION. >> -- ON THE SAME DAY THE NIH SAID THAT YES, THERE WAS A GAIN OF FUNCTION IN WUHAN, THE SAME DAY THE DEFINITION APPEARED, THE NEW DEFINITION TO TRY TO DEFINE AWAY WHAT'S GOING ON IN WUHAN. UNTIL YOU ACCEPT IT, UNTIL YOU ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET ANYWHERE TO TRYING TO PREVENT ANOTHER LAB LEAK OF THIS DANGEROUS SORT OF EXPERIMENT. YOU WON'T ADMIT THAT IT'S DANGEROUS AND FOR THAT LACK OF JUDGMENT I THINK IT'S TIME THAT YOU RESIGN. >> THANK YOU, SENATOR PAUL. I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THE TIME TO DR. FAUCI. >> YEAH, WELL, THERE ARE SO MANY THINGS THAT ARE EGREGIOUS MISREPRESENTATION HERE, MADAM CHAIR, THAT I DON'T THINK I WOULD BE ABLE TO REFUTE ALL OF THEM. BUT JUST A COUPLE OF THEM FOR THE LISTENERS TO HEAR. YOU HAVE SAID I AM UNWILLING TO TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CURRENT PANDEMIC. I HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CURRENT PANDEMIC. THE CURRENT PANDEMIC, OKAY? NUMBER TWO. YOU SAID THE OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE INDICATES A LAB LEAK. I BELIEVE MOST CARD-CARRYING VIRAL BIOLOGISTS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGISTS WOULD DISAGREE WITH YOU. EVEN THOUGH WE LEAVE OPEN ALL POSSIBILITIES, IT'S MUCH MORE LIKELY THAT THIS WAS A NATURAL OCCURRENCE. THIRD, YOU SAY WE CONTESTED 80,000 -- >> NO ANIMALS HAVE BEEN FOUND WITH COVID. >> SENATOR PAUL, THE TIME IS -- >> THIRD, YOU MADE A STATEMENT JUST A MOMENT AGO THAT'S COMPLETELY INCORRECT WHEN YOU SAY WE CONTINUE TO SUPPORT RESEARCH AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY. >> YOU PROVED IT IN AUGUST OF LAST YEAR. >> NO, NO. YOUR STATEMENT SAYS, QUOTE, I WROTE IT DOWN AS YOU WERE WRITING, YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT RESEARCH AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY. >> YOU WERE AT THE COMMITTEE A MONTH AGO, YOU STILL TRUST THE CHINESE SCIENTISTS. YOU SAID IT A MONTH AGO. >> SENATOR PAUL, I HAVE ALLOWED DR. FAUCI TO RESPOND. YOU'VE HAD YOUR TIME. >> HIS DISHONESTY OUGHT TO BE CHALLENGED. >> SENATOR PAUL, WE WILL ALLOW DR. FAUCI TO RESPOND AFTER YOU'VE GIVEN ACCUSATIONS LIKE THAT. DR. FAUCI. >> I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE TO SAY, I HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF RESPECT FOR THIS BODY OF THE SENATE AND IT MAKES ME VERY UNCOMFORTABLE TO HAVE TO SAY SOMETHING, BUT HE IS EGREGIOUSLY INCORRECT IN WHAT HE SAYS. THANK YOU. >> HISTORY WILL FIGURE THAT OUT ON ITS OWN. >>

ό Ραντ Πωλ έδωσε κι'αυτο

[Who is The 4th man]

επισης μια εκτεταμενη εξεταση του Δρ Φάουτσι απο τον Δρ Ραντ Πωλ στη γερουσία



αυτοματη μεταφρ. δηλ όχι ενσωματωμενη άρα όχι καλη